Skip to main content

Not Joe-the-Plumber...Joe-the-Rocketman!

This post is a response to “Joe’s” comments after my June 3 post about America’s first space walk and where we go from here.

First, Joe, I am completely flattered (honestly, that isn’t sarcasm)! This is exactly what I wanted from my blog: intelligent discussions about the things I love most, in this case space! So I would like to thank you for taking the time to write up those very eloquent comments and for reading my blog, even if you disagree with my views!


That said, I would first like to generally address your points. I’m not sure your background, so please forgive me if it seems I am assuming things; I can only go off what you have written. But, it seems to me you share the majority of the same opinions as nearly everyone on “that side” of the manned space flight debate; I really didn’t feel like I was reading anything new. Especially living here in Huntsville, it is hard to find someone without an opinion one way or the other about the space program. Your comments were thorough and logical…to a point. And while we can agree to disagree, I feel it is hard to compare our overarching ideals apples to apples; namely, that your views represent the “business” side of things, and mine (in general) represent the “exploration” side of things.

Don’t get me wrong, I can debate all day the technical aspects of today’s and future space programs, but these technicalities are not going to ignite the general public’s interest. In fact, I believe they would only widen the gap between those of us (I think you are included) that see a technical need for manned space flight and those that don’t have a clue what an SRB is (no offense to any of you out there ;-)). So, that is why I have attempted to shift my argument towards emotions, and feelings that everyone can relate to, rather than the obvious business and technical reasons for, or against, manned space flight.

However, I would like to comment on a few of your statements, from a more technical standpoint. You are right that Pres. Obama faced and is still facing “immense political pressure to cut spending.” I do not disagree one bit. However, I feel this new “plan” (if you can call it that) is only going to increase spending, and this is why…It is a known fact that Obama has added $6 billion in new funding over the next five years to “create jobs” and “land on Mars”. Personally I don’t think either of these things will happen in the time frame allotted which brings us back to square one in another decade under a new presidency.

The second piece of the budget puzzle links to your next ideal: use off-the-shelf products. Joe, I would love, love, love for this to happen. However, the reality of it is dim. Right now space is not profitable and companies like Boeing and Raytheon are not cheap. And it doesn’t help that NASA’s budget is fairly slim, compared to your military aircraft example. Now that I work for the Army, I can see firsthand its rather un-ending budget (the last figure I could find was a budget 40% more than NASA’s at approximately $652.5 billion in 2007) and all the non-public-knowledge money that gets funneled into specialized aircraft projects. I think it will take a great deal more money to contract these large rockets out (more completely than previously), still provide oversight and now provide a regulatory body to, almost redundantly, test the safety of these rockets.

And finally, I come to my most hated topic: politics. Again, I think it would be great to have a “genuinely-competitive market” as you suggest, but unfortunately I don’t think that will ever happen even if privatization does occur. It will still be a select few companies that receive the contracts from NASA, or whose products will be bought off-the-shelf (either because they are the lowest bidder or have such a history with NASA). We have seen this throughout the aerospace and defense industry for decades. And as much as I hate it, and complain about it, I really don’t think it is likely to change soon, if ever. Take for instance, your comment regarding SpaceX’s Falcon 9. Orbital has been launching successfully since the 80s with nearly the same cost-per-launch as SpaceX, however SpaceX has only been launching since 2002 and does not have a great success rate. Yet, NASA is looking to SpaceX for a heavy lift vehicle…it sounds to me like there is something fishy going on there (although I am not claiming to know for sure!).

After all these words, the bottom line is this: my goal is to raise awareness for space travel by appealing to the general public’s patriotism, need for exploration and desire to remain competitive with other countries in space. We as a nation will never get there without overwhelming support. So, let’s start at the bottom and build the foundation for America’s continued superiority in space!!


Thank you Joe for a great comment!!

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

MCM - Certified Mom

This morning I woke up early, the baby monitor was chirping just a few minutes before my alarm was set to go off. Chris graciously rolled out of bed and set out to re-insert Otto's paci. Meanwhile, I pressed my clothes, curled my hair and brewed some coffee - my standard pre-console routine. After a quick breakfast Zara peeped her head over the railing and I heard a gentle "mama" echo down the stairs. It was still dark, but this little one was ready for her daily breakfast of oatmeal and milk in preparation for a fun day at swim lessons and school. As she sat, eating her "oatsss" (as she calls them), I whirled around the kitchen prepping bottles, gathering outfits for school, and ensuring all the swim lesson supplies were set out. It's hard leaving Chris to take care of both kids in the morning (#momguilt) so I try my best to complete as many get-ahead tasks as possible, in hopes his morning goes smoothly. 
This morning schedule description may seem mundan…

MCM - On Call

It's definitely Monday. Otto spit up on my work clothes this morning, I forgot to brush my teeth and I sat down in my car forgetting to clean the layer of sand from the beach yesterday. Whoops. But, it's also MONDAY!!!!! Which means you get a special look behind the proverbial curtain of Mission Control in a series I'm dubbing "Mission Control Monday". We all need a little "boost" (pun intended) at the beginning of the week, so why not get it from the heart of Manned Spaceflight itself - NASA's Mission Control
This week I am highlighting the little known fact that sometimes, as an ADCO Specialist, I am scheduled to be "On Call". It just so happens I am "on-call" this week! Even though we don't have a sweet 1990's pager, the ADCO on-call is a Specialist with the cumbersome responsibility of having their cell phone strapped to them at all times. Yes, even during the night. Yes, even when you have a 3 month old. Yes, just…

Experience the Kennedy Space Center

Manned spaceflight is not a challenge forged from one molten idea - it's not a put-this-in get-that-out equation - it's not a sport for the isolationists. The notion that it was "one man's passion" or "one nation's resources" that got us to this engineering moment is simply false. And the idea that alienation could ever lead to exploration is impossible. There is likely no other industry or singular goal so intentional about teamwork - from employing teachers to technicians, soliciting standard to specialized natural resources, planning short term and long, investing in ideas and inspiration, training fresh-outs to experts, and communicating technically and politically. Tangibly, the manned spaceflight challenge crosses borders and age and gender, there are pieces of its presence spanning the entire globe, and beyond! 
One of those spots - notable for it's history as the last piece of Earth many astronauts touched before launch - is the Kennedy…
01 09 10