Skip to main content

The Findings...

Some of you may remember when I blogged about the Augustine Committee (you can click this link if you don't remember!).
Recently, the findings of the committee were announced. If you are interested you may read the full report here.

If you are not interested in reading the full report (which I admit, for a non-space-enthusiast may be slightly dull!)...I will summarize the main points.

1) "The right mission and the right size."

Basically, as it stands now, NASA's Human Space Flight endeavor is on an unsustainable trajectory. There is simply not enough money available to support the future programs in the time frame allotted. Money is being eaten up by possibly extending the space shuttle, which means further development on the Ares program is limited...and therefore slow.

2) Something I've been advocating since the 7th grade..."International Partnerships"

Yes, even back in 7th grade I saw the potential to create peaceful relationships with other countries through the medium of space travel and exploration. Not surprisingly, this point was emphasized as a means of creating safer and applicable rockets faster! Hurray for peace!!
3) Short-term Space Shuttle Planning

As many of you know...the space shuttle is scheduled to be retired end of FY 2010. To ensure safe flights the committee is recommending pushing this retire date to the second quarter of 2011 and to budget for that as appropriate. Safety = Good Idea!

4) The Human Space Flight Gap....aka: The Grand Canyon of human space flight

Yes the Gap...not the store, but the abyss between the shuttle's retirement and the inception of the next man-rated vehicle (whatever that is decided to be) is a slight sticking point. Any commercial development of a man-rated vehicle would take a significant chunk of time. The committee decided the best way to decrease the gap is to extend the life of the shuttle program.



5) Extending the International Space Station: duh?!?!?! You think we're going to retire that thing in 2016?!?!?!

So...yes...the committee decided we should extend the ISS life from its initial decomissioning date of 2016...am I surprised?!?! NO!



6) Heavy Lift: Not those big Sumo wrestlers or body builders...

No...more like a Sumo-rocket. Yes this is needed to launch giant payloads for trips to the moon or Mars. Ares-V is the current design planned...but this may change, stay tuned!

7) Commercial Crew-Launch to Low Earth Orbit (LEO)

With the right incentives, commercial companies can definitely accomplish this task...and this would give NASA a chance to focus on engineering new technology and to creatively make new discoveries...which are both in the "questions" NASA is trying to answer (I will discuss these later!).

8) Technology development for exploration and commercial space. Are you bored yet, I see those eyeballs wandering:-)

Basically we need to adequately fund a space technology program to enable progress in exploration. Umm...not really sure what to say about this one...except...DUH!

9) Pathway to Mars

Actually I think the committee said it best: "Mars is the ultimate destination for human exploration; but it is not the best first destination. Both visiting the Moon First and following the Flexible Path are viable exploration strategies. The two are not necessarily mutually exclusive; before traveling to Mars, we might be well served to both extend our presence in free space and gain experience working on the lunar surface."
So, I realize this was a long post, but I feel analyzing and understanding where our country is going in terms of space travel is very important. NASA's annual budget is close to 16 billion dollars. This is the smallest budget of any US government agency, and it actually has largest return. For every dollar NASA gets in its budget, seven dollars are spent in the economy - on labor, research, instrumentation, fuel, education and public outreach. It's a big expense but when you think that the cure for cancer, or the next home for the world's growing population may come from space, perhaps it's worth it after all.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The road to curing Type 1 Diabetes

From the moment of diagnosis, the road is rough, the learning curve is steep and the stakes are literally life or death. The map is less-than-helpful - paths originating from virtually every corner, coalescing at a center point (aka "diagnosis") and bursting back outwards - some paths cross and wrap around each other but others are isolated. And even with all of these roads, most of the territory is uncharted - how did we all get here and how will we all exit? Where are the obstacles we haven't found yet? Which passage holds the key to unlocking the solution?

On any given day I feel pretty isolated with this disease - I'm the only T1D in my group at work, the only one in mission control, the only one in my family. I go through the logistics of calling insurance companies, ordering supplies, changing sites and troubleshooting malfunctions mostly on my own. Even those pesky carbs really only get counted in my brain, no group think for a meal bolus here. But there is b…

Hot OJT

Last week I had the chance to mentor a newly certified ADCO trainee - the NASA process is called "Hot On-The-Job-Training", or Hot OJT. What makes it "hot" you ask? Well, essentially I am hands off - he is sitting at the console, working all the plan reviews and updates, making calls to other flight controllers and to the flight director, reacting to anomalies and preparing material for the shift handover. My job is to act as the fault tolerance - a backup ADCO of sorts.

Tuesday was his last official day and by Wednesday morning he was in the backroom sending commands to ISS in preparation for the docking of a three-person Soyuz.


The beauty of this system is the gradual buildup in responsibility. There is a subtle shift from student, to subject matter expert, to fresh operations trainee to advanced trainee and finally to certification and real-time operations flight controller - the process takes two years on average and is considered by many to be enough specializ…

Dolla-betes

Healthcare is such a tricky subject. Ironically, it seems the conversation has shifted away from health CARE in favor of divisive politics with a healthy side of cash. But I'm here to tell you there are real people dealing with real diseases behind all those numbers. And with a laser focus on the rising cost of insulin lately and advocacy groups like #insulin4all making waves, it prompted me to take a look at my own T1D cost breakdown.

**Please keep in mind I have (pretty good!) private insurance through my husband's employer and our income allows us to absorb these costs without pinching too many pennies. We have also been graced with good health (diabetes notwithstanding) and rarely order any prescriptions outside of those for my T1D. But its clear only a slight shift in this delicate equation can make for a dire situation.

Here's what my out-of-pocket looks like to cover type 1 diabetes annually:


The numbers above reflect simply the "baseline operating costs"…
01 09 10